Tag Archives: Clinton

They Have Nothing On Him…

To anyone who has the ability to critically analyze what’s been going on in this country over the last few months (so, the media, Democrat party leaders, many celebrities and a good deal of the rank-and-file followers of all of the parties preceding are excluded) it should be obvious that:

(1) the reason Obama and his people spied on Mr. Trump was, simply, to find some dirt on him that would have been leaked to the press in order to damage his candidacy. The “prick-tator” himself was so certain that they’d find something on Mr. Trump, it was the reason he and many surrogates in the donkey party and the media (yes, some of whom were likely in on it) were running about proclaiming with certitude that Mr. Trump will “never” be President.

(2) by their very (in)action, it is clear that the charge of Russian collusion is utter and complete bullcrap, why? Because if it were true, Obama’s minions would have leaked it prior to November, 8th with the intent being, again, to influence voters.

(3) Obama was obviously aware of what was going on here and it was the reason why, with days remaining in office, he authorized the exchange of intelligence between the various agencies. He knew.

The following piece was true when it was written and almost on a daily basis now, we are finding out how much so: https://mononymous1.wordpress.com/2014/05/28/the-broken-windows-theory-now-applies-to-government/

It’ll be no surprise if, some time from now, we learn that a good deal of the Washington, D.C. elites and power brokers (in Congress, the media, etc.) were covertly spied upon under Obama’s direction. We already know of James Rosen and the Senate Intelligence Committee. This may well include Chief Justice John Roberts and it will certainly explain his Obamacare decision. In short, we may find that a number of these people have been or could have been threatened with blackmail. It will be no surprise if we find out that Obama’s spying on Mr. Trump actually began when the latter was talking about the former’s birth certificate issue. This is what tin-pot dictators do.

It’d seem to me that, if the Russians really wanted to influence our elections, they would have released, through Wikileaks, for example, the 30-33K missing Hillary Clinton emails; it is very likely that they and others, have them (I was once involved with a small business and its servers were routinely attacked; is there anyone out there who actually believes that her private servers were not hacked?). Why haven’t these emails been leaked? Because they can be leveraged and only God knows what would have happened to this country and its interests if Mrs. Clinton was elected.

To conclude, what can we expect going forward? Well, Congress is on the case, actually, they are on their high horse, as usual. When was the last time any of their so-called “investigation” resulted in anything, anything? For example, is that known lying sack of excrement, Susan Rice, likely to go to jail (along with some of her underlings)? Don’t think so. Her primary exemption, of course, is her race. And with Republicans in charge, well; “it’s not who we are…” as Obama would say. However, what we were under his administration was nothing but a third world country with first world means and for Democrats, the ends justified the means.

Advertisements

You’ve Taught Us Well, Leftists…

During the Monica Lewinsky affair, the same left that is now positively orgasmic about various allegations regarding Mr. Trump’s “sexual misconduct” and talk were doing yeoman’s work at defending a man who’d later be impeached. Who has forgotten the parade of cabinet members on the White House lawn and one after another (starting, as I recall, with Madeline Notbright) proclaiming Mr. Clinton’s innocence? (Compare this “circling of the wagons” with what the various pussies in the Republican fraternity recently did with respect to Mr. Trump’s “locker room talk”.) Later on, we were told how this was all about sex, Mr. Clinton’s private business, didn’t affect his ability to govern, the behavior was simply reprehensible, etc, etc. So, the hypocrisy is stunning but not unexpected.

What I hope is the result of the above episode and the cumulative effect of all of the other accusations against Mr. Clinton (undeniably enabled by his wife) is simply this: Mr. Trump may have been (or may be) a sex maniac but he’s ours. We have no choice but to overlook all of it because the level of corruption and incompetence in the alternative is simply not acceptable. The only way the media and leftists, in general, will succeed in this election is if we allow them to use our standards and sense of morality against us. So, let them feign their outrage because, using their own standards, we know that they cannot possibly be. What they are hoping to do, is outrage the rest of us and thus decrease support for Mr. Trump.

Not this time, media and leftists (to repeat myself), there is too much at stake. Go ahead, make all the accusations you want, we will support Mr. Trump anyway because he’s the last best hope and our only chance to tear down an entirely corrupt system…AND because you’ve taught us well.

“DESPERATE…”

It’d seem to me that by now, the Trump campaign ought to be pinning the “desperate” label on the Clinton campaign, specifically, as follows:

HRC is “desperate” because:

She has no vision for the future of this country that is any different from the failed and extremist policies she and her party have offered for the last 50 years and those that have been implemented over the last 7 years by the Obama administration.

She has come to the realization that you cannot fool all of the people all of the time and that the farce that has been the Obama administration will not be given a third term.

With 90+ % of the media as her puppets, she will not win and has taken to wondering why she is not 50 points ahead.

Automatically disqualified herself by mishandling classified information and finally understands that the American people, the “deplorables,” will not support and promote a lying, crooked, lawless person to the highest office in the land.

Knows that absolute power corrupts absolutely, has craved it her entire life and sees her chance for it slipping away.

The President’s and her racist and sexist appeal to divisions along race and sexist lines is simply not working.

Bought and paid for, she will not be able to deliver to her donors, foreign and domestic and the Clinton Foundation may be bankrupted as a result. She’s on notice that America and the Oval Office are not for sale.

Because the only experience she has is in setting the world on fire, deleting emails and believing that servers can be protected by the Secret Service and that they can be wiped with “a cloth.”

Her only claims to success have been in containing “bimbo eruptions,” evading indictment for various criminal activities and defending a child rapist.

Realizes that airline staff who have flown to 113 countries are better qualified than she is.

Recognizes that the American people see the utter hypocrisy in the argument that she’s the “most qualified” to run for President which suggests that Obama must have been the least qualified and yet by her and her party’s measure, the inexperienced one has done a terrific job.

Made a mistake by prematurely declaring her imperiousness by referring to Republicans and Conservatives as enemies worse than terrorists; they’ve come to understand that they will suffer the most if she wins.

The Audacity of that Hopeless Reprobate Clinton (HRC)

What seems to be missing from the discussion of what Mrs. Clinton has been up to is the utter audacity, chutzpah, of the woman.  Here we have someone, the Prince Charles of American politics as I have previously referred to her, whom we all know has lusted for the power of the presidency since, well, at least 2007.  This person had to have known for sometime now and particularly during her time at the State Department, that she will run again for the office.  And yet, with the run likely being a near certainty (with the possible exception being for her health), she knowingly, willfully and with reckless disregard for security, setup her very own email server in Chappaqua.  This, necessitated by the single “fact” that she didn’t want to carry more than one mobile device.  Who, out there, actually believes this?


More well-qualified people will inform us about the legal ramifications of what she has done so, let’s focus for a minute on what it suggests.  What it shows is a person who simply does not believe that the law and rules should be an impediment to her ambitions or personal interests.  The “smartest” woman in the world had to know that her use of a personal server would become public or at minimum, that the risk of this exposure could be problematic and yet, she forged ahead in the unprecedented manner (nevermind the spin from her eunuchs about Colin Powell, etc.).  So, what made her do it?  Did she really think it was not a problem (knowing differently and again, presumably, knowing the security risks), did she think it would have been kept hidden or did she do it because she thought there was no downside at all?  We have to eliminate the first of these because, surely, someone would have advised her that the security risk alone was not worth it (it is simply unbelievable that Mrs. Clinton has actually attacked the Chicoms for hacking into the US Government protected OPM database and yet, some how, we are to believe that her little server in Chappaqua escaped attention).  This leaves us with either the thinking that the server would have been kept secret (willing accomplices in the media) or that the risk of exposure and potential damage from it were far outweighed by whatever there was to gain; that is, carrying only one mobile device, does anyone believe this?

If you don’t, you have to think what this says about Mrs. Clinton and what it’d mean if she has unfettered and fully confidential access to the levers of power in Washington, D.C.  The audacity of this person and her history (and we only need go to the infamous Youtube/Benghazi lies for affirmation) should disqualify her from even running for the presidency in the minds of most fair and serious minded persons.  Mrs. Clinton needs to understand that at some point, her baggage will and should make a difference.

By the way, when she relaunches her campaign (inevitably), this should be her calling card:
 hrc_relaunched