You’ve Taught Us Well, Leftists…

During the Monica Lewinsky affair, the same left that is now positively orgasmic about various allegations regarding Mr. Trump’s “sexual misconduct” and talk were doing yeoman’s work at defending a man who’d later be impeached. Who has forgotten the parade of cabinet members on the White House lawn and one after another (starting, as I recall, with Madeline Notbright) proclaiming Mr. Clinton’s innocence? (Compare this “circling of the wagons” with what the various pussies in the Republican fraternity recently did with respect to Mr. Trump’s “locker room talk”.) Later on, we were told how this was all about sex, Mr. Clinton’s private business, didn’t affect his ability to govern, the behavior was simply reprehensible, etc, etc. So, the hypocrisy is stunning but not unexpected.

What I hope is the result of the above episode and the cumulative effect of all of the other accusations against Mr. Clinton (undeniably enabled by his wife) is simply this: Mr. Trump may have been (or may be) a sex maniac but he’s ours. We have no choice but to overlook all of it because the level of corruption and incompetence in the alternative is simply not acceptable. The only way the media and leftists, in general, will succeed in this election is if we allow them to use our standards and sense of morality against us. So, let them feign their outrage because, using their own standards, we know that they cannot possibly be. What they are hoping to do, is outrage the rest of us and thus decrease support for Mr. Trump.

Not this time, media and leftists (to repeat myself), there is too much at stake. Go ahead, make all the accusations you want, we will support Mr. Trump anyway because he’s the last best hope and our only chance to tear down an entirely corrupt system…AND because you’ve taught us well.

Advertisements

Bullying – Kaine Shows How It’s Done

On full display last night was the left’s approach to dealing with their “political enemies.” These people have more interest in “dialog” with ISIS and terrorists in general rather than try to change hearts and minds on public policy matters. As with every thing else with liberals, they most often accuse others of the very thing they are themselves guilty of, bullying other people is one such example. The natural outcome, when they win elections, is to use the force of the government to bully the populace – fascism, really.

Mr. Pence, in my view, showed enormous restraint in dealing with this tiresome clown. I know I’d have told him to save the filibustering and rude interruptions for the Senate floor. It was evident from the start that this was going to be Mr. Kaine’s conduct for the duration of the “debate” with a willing accomplice in the moderator.

Incidentally, one can always tell how effective the left think the moderator was by looking at the criticism they receive (from the left) after these “debates.” With the Matt Lauer forum criticism as a baseline, Mr. Holt and Ms. Quijano must have done splendidly in order to be spared their wrath.

When asked why 60% of voters distrust Mrs. Clinton, the imbecile replied, “Elaine, let me tell you why I trust Hillary Clinton. Here’s what people should look at as they look at a public servant. Do they have a passion in their life that showed up before they were in public life? And have they held onto that passion throughout their life, regardless of whether they were in office or not, succeeding or failing?”

Aside from being a bunch of utter crap, the summary is this; outcomes don’t matter, it’s all about the intention. A typical example is Obamacare, we “intended” to cover x millions of uninsured but if it ruins every thing else, that’s okay; we had the passion, you see. Mrs. Clinton spent 8 years in the Senate using it as a stepping stone to run for President; during this time, none of this “passion” showed up at all – not a single bill was sponsored by her to do any of the things she claims to want to do now – to make our lives better. That’s right, she DID NOT SPONSOR A SINGLE BILL (to “fix” any of the problems she purports to know, now, how to “fix”) during her tenure in office!

Finally, regarding the Putin nonsense; who was it, Mr. Kaine, that told Mr. Medvedev before the 2012 election, to let “Vladimir know” that he was going to be more “flexible” AFTER the elections? What did this convey to Mr. Putin, other than weakness and who ran the State Department at the time?